Wordmark SVG — review before propagation

Locked spec → SVG values

• V scale factor 30.2162 → 39.85 (V path height 37 units × 39.85 = 1474.45 ≈ 0.72em × 2048)
• V translate unchanged: translate(-5 -45)
• "ecreal" letter translates all shifted +301:
  e 1186→1487, c 2295→2596, r 3385→3686, e 4096→4397, a 5205→5506, l 6278→6579
• Dot radius r=184 → 226 (0.22em × 2048 / 2)
• Dot cy -184 → -226 (bottom stays at baseline y=0)
• Dot cx 7011 → 7440 (l_translate 6579 + l_advance 569 + letter_spacing -102 + margin 168 + r 226)
• ViewBox -50 -1600 7296 1700 → -50 -1536 7800 2048 (width expanded for new content; HEIGHT corrected to 2048 = 1 em in Inter upm so SVG renders at correct scale)
• ViewBox height correction (rev 2): previous proposal used height 1700 which rendered SVG ~22% larger than CSS at same nominal height. Fix: height = 2048 (= 1em in Inter upm), y_min = -1536 (typo-ascender), y_max = +512 (typo-descender). Baseline at 75% from top of em-box, matching CSS line-box layout.
• V path unchanged — same M-L-Q-L-L-L-L-Z geometry
• Inter glyph paths unchanged — same Inter Semibold outlines
• Color tokens unchanged — clay-light (#A05847) light, clay-bright (#C68070) dark, ecreal #1a1817 / #f7f8f8

The +2px translation choice

CSS dot margin-left is calc(0.04em + 2px). The fixed +2px doesn't translate cleanly to em-based SVG. Baked as 0.082em in the SVG (= 168 viewBox units), which matches the CSS exactly at .size-lg (48px). At smaller sizes the SVG dot is ~0.5px tighter than CSS; at larger sizes ~1px looser. Below visual-perception threshold.

Walk through each comparison row:

• NEW SVG vs CSS at 48px (★) — should be pixel-identical or within sub-pixel anti-aliasing. This is the reference size.
• V height in NEW SVG matches "l" cap-height (uppercase) in all sizes.
• V-e gap in NEW SVG matches the CSS column's tight V-to-e relationship.
• Dot position sits at baseline (dot bottom touching baseline) in both NEW SVG and CSS.
• Dot size is visibly larger than the OLD SVG column (0.18em → 0.22em is +22% diameter).
• "ecreal" letters render identically in NEW SVG and CSS (same Inter Semibold paths; spacing comes out the same).
• Old SVG comparison — confirm we ARE leaving behind: smaller V (lowercase), smaller dot, looser V-e, dot too small to read clearly at 22px.

If NEW SVG looks right at 48px AND tracks the CSS at the other sizes within visual tolerance → approve and propagate. If anything's off (e.g., dot too small, V height wrong, position off), tell me which dimension to tune and I re-derive the values.